| Summary: | Update request: kernel-linus 6.6.14 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Marja Van Waes <marja11> |
| Component: | Security | Assignee: | QA Team <qa-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Sec team <security> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | andrewsfarm, fri, geiger.david68210, ghibomgx, joselp, lewyssmith, mageia, marja11, qa-bugs, security, sysadmin-bugs, tarazed25 |
| Version: | 9 | Keywords: | FOR_ERRATA9, advisory, validated_update |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.1 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.2 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.3 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.4 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.5 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.6 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.7 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.8 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.9 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.10 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.11 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.12 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.13 https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/ChangeLog-6.6.14 https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-448.html | ||
| Whiteboard: | MGA9-64-OK MGA9-32-OK | ||
| Source RPM: | kernel-linus-6.5.13-2.mga9 | CVE: | CVE-2023-6610, CVE-2023-46838 |
| Status comment: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 32786, 32791 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Marja Van Waes
2024-01-30 20:32:45 CET
Marja Van Waes
2024-01-30 20:36:04 CET
Assignee:
bugsquad =>
qa-bugs This is confusing. Why just kernel-linus? Is the same release already in Backports? If so, should it not be moved to core/updates_testing then core/updates? Has it already been QA'd? CC:
(none) =>
lewyssmith TMB always kept kernel-linus in a separate bug to differentiate it from the other kernels. The other kernels include our patches, while kernel-linus is closer to the "vanilla" Linux kernel. I can't confirm my speculation, but I think he did this to avoid contamination of kernel-linus by mistake during development.
Marja Van Waes
2024-01-30 21:55:39 CET
Keywords:
(none) =>
advisory Yes, and sometimes -desktop and -server kernels get more iterations, example 6.5.13 landed on -2 for linus, -6 for the others. Like for the other kernels, his bug should depend on updates of dkms-anbox, mate-applets and gnome-applets https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32786#c62 (In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #3) > Like for the other kernels, his bug should depend on updates of > dkms-anbox, mate-applets and gnome-applets No need, because this bug depends on the 6.6.16 desktop/server bug. Tested in Real Hardware Mageia 9 i586 lxqt wifi works webcam works sound works mount isos with cdemu-client that require dkms-vhba works Like other 6.6.14 kernels release 1 this kernel make my card use radeon driver instead amdgpu in my x86_64 system
inxi -F
System:
Host: phoenix Kernel: 6.6.14-desktop-1.mga9 arch: x86_64 bits: 64
Desktop: LXQt v: 1.4.0 Distro: Mageia 9
Machine:
Type: Desktop Mobo: Intel model: DH55HC v: AAE70933-505
serial: <superuser required> BIOS: Intel v: TCIBX10H.86A.0037.2010.0614.1712
date: 06/14/2010
CPU:
Info: dual core model: Intel Core i5 650 bits: 64 type: MT MCP cache:
L2: 512 KiB
Speed (MHz): avg: 1330 min/max: 1197/3193 cores: 1: 1197 2: 1463 3: 1197
4: 1463
Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Cape Verde XT [Radeon HD 7770/8760 / R7 250X] driver: radeon
v: kernel
Display: x11 server: X.org v: 1.21.1.8 with: Xwayland v: 22.1.9 driver: X:
loaded: radeon unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa dri: radeonsi gpu: radeon
resolution: 1360x768~60Hz
API: OpenGL v: 4.5 Mesa 23.3.3 renderer: VERDE (radeonsi LLVM 15.0.6 DRM
2.50 6.6.14-desktop-1.mga9)
Audio:
Device-1: Intel 5 Series/3400 Series High Definition Audio
driver: snd_hda_intel
Device-2: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape Verde/Pitcairn HDMI Audio [Radeon HD 7000
Series] driver: snd_hda_intel
API: ALSA v: k6.6.14-desktop-1.mga9 status: kernel-api
Server-1: PulseAudio v: 16.1 status: active
Network:
Device-1: Intel 82578DC Gigabit Network driver: e1000e
IF: eno1 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: e0:69:95:dd:cd:47
IF-ID-1: virbr0 state: down mac: 52:54:00:62:71:70
Drives:
Local Storage: total: 298.09 GiB used: 206.88 GiB (69.4%)
ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Western Digital model: WD3200BEKT-60V5T1
size: 298.09 GiB
Partition:
ID-1: / size: 49.2 GiB used: 14.27 GiB (29.0%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
ID-2: /home size: 238.91 GiB used: 192.61 GiB (80.6%) fs: ext4
dev: /dev/sda6
Swap:
ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 4 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) dev: /dev/sda5
Sensors:
System Temperatures: cpu: 31.0 C mobo: N/A gpu: radeon temp: 42.0 C
Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A
Info:
Processes: 223 Uptime: 7m Memory: 9.59 GiB used: 1.11 GiB (11.6%)
Shell: Bash inxi: 3.3.26
The rest is working as expected
Like other 6.6.14 kernels release 1 this kernel make my card use radeon driver instead amdgpu in my x86_64 system
inxi -F
System:
Host: phoenix Kernel: 6.6.14-1.mga9 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: LXQt
v: 1.4.0 Distro: Mageia 9
Machine:
Type: Desktop Mobo: Intel model: DH55HC v: AAE70933-505
serial: <superuser required> BIOS: Intel v: TCIBX10H.86A.0037.2010.0614.1712
date: 06/14/2010
CPU:
Info: dual core model: Intel Core i5 650 bits: 64 type: MT MCP cache:
L2: 512 KiB
Speed (MHz): avg: 1299 min/max: 1197/3193 cores: 1: 1356 2: 1197 3: 1449
4: 1197
Graphics:
Device-1: AMD Cape Verde XT [Radeon HD 7770/8760 / R7 250X] driver: radeon
v: kernel
Display: x11 server: X.org v: 1.21.1.8 with: Xwayland v: 22.1.9 driver: X:
loaded: radeon unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa dri: radeonsi gpu: radeon
resolution: 1360x768~60Hz
API: OpenGL v: 4.5 Mesa 23.3.3 renderer: VERDE (radeonsi LLVM 15.0.6 DRM
2.50 6.6.14-1.mga9)
Audio:
Device-1: Intel 5 Series/3400 Series High Definition Audio
driver: snd_hda_intel
Device-2: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape Verde/Pitcairn HDMI Audio [Radeon HD 7000
Series] driver: snd_hda_intel
API: ALSA v: k6.6.14-1.mga9 status: kernel-api
Server-1: PulseAudio v: 16.1 status: active
Network:
Device-1: Intel 82578DC Gigabit Network driver: e1000e
IF: eno1 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: e0:69:95:dd:cd:47
IF-ID-1: virbr0 state: down mac: 52:54:00:62:71:70
Drives:
Local Storage: total: 298.09 GiB used: 206.88 GiB (69.4%)
ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Western Digital model: WD3200BEKT-60V5T1
size: 298.09 GiB
Partition:
ID-1: / size: 49.2 GiB used: 14.26 GiB (29.0%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
ID-2: /home size: 238.91 GiB used: 192.61 GiB (80.6%) fs: ext4
dev: /dev/sda6
Swap:
ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 4 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) dev: /dev/sda5
Sensors:
System Temperatures: cpu: 44.0 C mobo: N/A gpu: radeon temp: 43.0 C
Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A
Info:
Processes: 235 Uptime: 2m Memory: 9.59 GiB used: 1.11 GiB (11.6%)
The rest is working as expected (Sorry in previous message I boot on wrong kernel)
Comment 7 implies also linus should be updated like desktop -2 version. Keywords:
(none) =>
feedback
Frédéric "LpSolit" Buclin
2024-02-01 00:07:27 CET
CC:
LpSolit =>
(none) @Giuseppe? (In reply to katnatek from comment #7) > Like other 6.6.14 kernels release 1 this kernel make my card use radeon > driver instead amdgpu in my x86_64 system (In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #8) > Comment 7 implies also linus should be updated like desktop -2 version.
Morgan Leijström
2024-02-04 19:37:40 CET
Status comment:
(none) =>
Need update? Comment 7 (In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #9) > @Giuseppe? > > (In reply to katnatek from comment #7) > > Like other 6.6.14 kernels release 1 this kernel make my card use radeon > > driver instead amdgpu in my x86_64 system > > (In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #8) > > Comment 7 implies also linus should be updated like desktop -2 version. Indeed it doesn't require the patch. kernel-desktop-6.6.14-2 had a previous patch reworked to get some old card treated with amdgpu. kernel-linus is usually kept without patches, close to stock upstream kernel, unless some rare case of security fixes or obvious crashes requiring a patch. OK thanks for the info. I believe this update is good to go when the other kernels are good to go. (waiting for dkms-anbox and maybe other) Keywords:
feedback =>
(none) Other test made in abut this kernel in bug#32786 https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32786#c21 https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32786#c71 (In reply to Giuseppe Ghibò from comment #10) > (In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #9) > > > @Giuseppe? > > > > (In reply to katnatek from comment #7) > > > Like other 6.6.14 kernels release 1 this kernel make my card use radeon > > > driver instead amdgpu in my x86_64 system > > > > (In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #8) > > > Comment 7 implies also linus should be updated like desktop -2 version. > > Indeed it doesn't require the patch. kernel-desktop-6.6.14-2 had a previous > patch reworked to get some old card treated with amdgpu. kernel-linus is > usually kept without patches, close to stock upstream kernel, unless some > rare case of security fixes or obvious crashes requiring a patch. I think this will need a Errata with the Morgan's tip of delete /etc/X11/xorg.conf Keywords:
(none) =>
FOR_ERRATA9 (In reply to katnatek from comment #13) > I think this will need a Errata with the Morgan's tip of delete > /etc/X11/xorg.conf Ref: Bug 32786 Comment 24 Are we sure this works OK? (In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #14) > (In reply to katnatek from comment #13) > > I think this will need a Errata with the Morgan's tip of delete > > /etc/X11/xorg.conf > > Ref: Bug 32786 Comment 24 > > Are we sure this works OK? Works for me If boot in kernel server I get amdgpu inxi -F System: Host: phoenix Kernel: 6.6.14-server-2.mga9 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: LXQt v: 1.4.0 Distro: Mageia 9 Machine: Type: Desktop Mobo: Intel model: DH55HC v: AAE70933-505 serial: <superuser required> BIOS: Intel v: TCIBX10H.86A.0037.2010.0614.1712 date: 06/14/2010 CPU: Info: dual core model: Intel Core i5 650 bits: 64 type: MT MCP cache: L2: 512 KiB Speed (MHz): avg: 1309 min/max: 1197/3193 cores: 1: 1312 2: 1390 3: 1248 4: 1286 Graphics: Device-1: AMD Cape Verde XT [Radeon HD 7770/8760 / R7 250X] driver: amdgpu v: kernel Display: x11 server: X.org v: 1.21.1.8 with: Xwayland v: 22.1.9 driver: X: loaded: amdgpu unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa dri: radeonsi gpu: amdgpu resolution: 1360x768~60Hz API: OpenGL v: 4.6 Mesa 23.3.3 renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series (radeonsi verde LLVM 15.0.6 DRM 3.54 6.6.14-server-2.mga9) And I don't regenerate /etc/X11/xorg.conf because drakx11 select amdgpu MGA9-64 Plasma, Dell e520, Core2Quad, AMD HD 8570 (Oland - Southern Islands) graphics. I ran into the same problem as katnatek, except that my machine wouldn't boot even with the radeon driver. I'm not surprised by this, as it would not boot any of the Mageia 8 kernels with anything but the amdgpu driver. In Mageia 8, sddm would fail. I suspect it could be the same here. TMB and I fought that battle some time ago, because the Live Mageia 8 Plasma test isos would not boot on this hardware. I don't remember ever trying kernel-linus on this hardware before, so I have no idea how long it's been since it may have worked with it. I have another set of hardware that won't work with kernel -linus because it needs one of our patches to make it work with the radeon driver and modern kernels - Foolishness, my Dell Inspiron 5100. If our mainstream kernels won't work with the older hardware, we should try to patch them so they do, but I agree with comment 10 that we don't need to patch kernel-linus for this old hardware. Validating. Keywords:
(none) =>
validated_update (In reply to Thomas Andrews from comment #16) > MGA9-64 Plasma, Dell e520, Core2Quad, AMD HD 8570 (Oland - Southern Islands) > graphics. > > I ran into the same problem as katnatek, except that my machine wouldn't > boot even with the radeon driver. I'm not surprised by this, as it would not > boot any of the Mageia 8 kernels with anything but the amdgpu driver. In > Mageia 8, sddm would fail. I suspect it could be the same here. > does kernel-linus won't boot even in console mode or just when switching to graphical mode? Does it work either with: a) "modesetting" instead of "radeon" or "amdgpu" as device in xorg.conf b) no /etc/X11/xorg.conf at all. ? > TMB and I fought that battle some time ago, because the Live Mageia 8 Plasma > test isos would not boot on this hardware. I don't remember ever trying > kernel-linus on this hardware before, so I have no idea how long it's been > since it may have worked with it. I have another set of hardware that won't > work with kernel -linus because it needs one of our patches to make it work > with the radeon driver and modern kernels - Foolishness, my Dell Inspiron > 5100. > > If our mainstream kernels won't work with the older hardware, we should try Stock kernel-6.6.14-2.mga9 should work for you as in the past, as it has the patch reworked. > to patch them so they do, but I agree with comment 10 that we don't need to > patch kernel-linus for this old hardware. > > Validating. The stock kernel does work with the amdgpu driver. I am able to boot into run level 3 and log on with kernel-linus regardless of the assigned driver. I can't run startx with the amdgpu driver. It refuses, giving me a message that it is trying a modesetting driver, and that also fails. Switching to root, I used XFdrake to switch to the radeon driver, and rebooted again into run level 3. This time startx appears to work, showing the graphical representation of sddm starting, playing the music, but then ends up with a black screen containing only a movable mouse cursor. Using XFdrake to switch to the Xorg modesetting driver acts the same as the radeon driver. I'm removing kernel-linus from this machine and getting on with my life. An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository. https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2024-0032.html Resolution:
(none) =>
FIXED This bug depend on Bug 32786. How come this god pushed before that one? No problem here - just asking about in cases when an update *must not* get pushed before another update, how to realise that? |