| Summary: | Missing information when you have to decide between packages during updating | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Wolfgang Bornath <molch.b> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vignaud> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OLD | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | herrold, lewyssmith, molch.b, n3npq, thierry.vignaud |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | rpmdrake | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Wolfgang Bornath
2011-10-29 12:29:59 CEST
Manuel Hiebel
2011-10-31 11:06:56 CET
Assignee:
bugsquad =>
thierry.vignaud
Thierry Vignaud
2011-11-22 13:53:44 CET
Source RPM:
urpmi =>
rpmdrake the issue hereis a build system error ...%[edatacalmajor} ... was undefined, was it not? CC:
(none) =>
herrold I don't think so because this issue has been around for years in Mandrake, Mandriva and now Mageia. Of course I don't know about the technical background, so it could be that all of them had/have the same error :) CC:
(none) =>
molch.b (aside) The reason for the tracking != the original problem. There's a need to map more information into synthesis/hdlists used by URPMI related to "How could a user ..." question Hi, This bug was filed against cauldron, but we do not have cauldron at the moment. Please report whether this bug is still valid for Mageia 2. Thanks :) Cheers, marja Keywords:
(none) =>
NEEDINFO
Manuel Hiebel
2012-06-12 21:26:18 CEST
Keywords:
NEEDINFO =>
(none)
Thierry Vignaud
2012-09-07 17:07:54 CEST
Summary:
MIssing information when you have to decide between packages during updating =>
Missing information when you have to decide between packages during updating This bug is very old (2011) & very long neglected (2012). The point is valid, and I think applies for package installation as well. I am always baffled by the choice offered, and half suspect that bare <Enter> takes the first one. Given this detail: "Of course you can open rpmdrake to see a description of the package but most times the descriptions of the packages in question are identical", it is difficult to suggest what more we can do - it defies easy description. Can we close this as 'old'? CC:
(none) =>
lewyssmith, thierry.vignaud No reactions since 3 years after Lewis called for it. Closing OLD. Feel free to reopen if necessary. Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |