| Summary: | gssntlmssp new security issues CVE-2023-2556[3-7] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | David Walser <luigiwalser> |
| Component: | Security | Assignee: | QA Team <qa-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Sec team <security> |
| Severity: | major | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | andrewsfarm, davidwhodgins, geiger.david68210, herman.viaene, neoser10, sysadmin-bugs, tarazed25 |
| Version: | 8 | Keywords: | advisory, validated_update |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | MGA8-64-OK | ||
| Source RPM: | gssntlmssp-1.1.0-3.mga9.src.rpm | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
David Walser
2023-02-19 17:10:43 CET
David Walser
2023-02-19 17:10:54 CET
Status comment:
(none) =>
Fixed upstream in 1.2.0 Done for mga8 and Cauldron! CC:
(none) =>
geiger.david68210 Thanks for instant fix, DavidG. Assigning to you, assuming you will quickly pass it - with advisory - to QA for M8. Assignee:
bugsquad =>
geiger.david68210 gssntlmssp-devel-1.2.0-1.mga8 gssntlmssp-1.2.0-1.mga8 from gssntlmssp-1.2.0-1.mga8.src.rpm Assignee:
geiger.david68210 =>
qa-bugs $ urpmq -i gssntlmssp [...] Summary : GSSAPI NTLMSSP Mechanism Just a FYI. Sounds like developer country: General Security Services API No idea how to test this but it updates cleanly. CC:
(none) =>
tarazed25 I think this can be tested with SAMBA in server mode, acting as NT4 Server The SAMBA configured as AD, may be can be used to test trying to connect from M$ desktop not joined to domain CC:
(none) =>
neoser10 MGA8-64 MATE on Acer Aspire 5253 No installation issues. No previous updates, so trying to find something # urpmq --whatrequires gssntlmssp gssntlmssp # urpmq --whatrequires-recursive gssntlmssp gssntlmssp Not very helpfull, so trying to do something along the line suggested by Mauricio, but that takes more time...... CC:
(none) =>
herman.viaene Looking for guidance found https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller Reading this, I make the conclusion that that would take me at least a day to study and try/fail cycles to get this working. I don't have that time today or tomorrow. So, up to the higher powers to decide, but as Len I wouldn't object to an OK based on clean install and no ill effects on usual networking. When our two most experienced QA testers both say a clean update should be enough, we should listen to them. Sorry it took me so long, guys. Validating. Whiteboard:
(none) =>
MGA8-64-OK
Dave Hodgins
2023-03-23 23:51:43 CET
Keywords:
(none) =>
advisory An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository. https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2023-0108.html Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |