| Summary: | matio new security issues CVE-2020-36428 and CVE-2021-36977 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | David Walser <luigiwalser> |
| Component: | Security | Assignee: | QA Team <qa-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Sec team <security> |
| Severity: | major | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | andrewsfarm, davidwhodgins, herman.viaene, nicolas.salguero, sysadmin-bugs, tarazed25 |
| Version: | 8 | Keywords: | advisory, validated_update |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | MGA8-64-OK | ||
| Source RPM: | matio-1.5.21-1.mga8.src.rpm | CVE: | CVE-2020-36428, CVE-2021-36977 |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
David Walser
2022-12-08 15:26:08 CET
David Walser
2022-12-08 15:26:23 CET
Status comment:
(none) =>
Fixed upstream in 1.5.22 Suggested advisory: ======================== The updated packages fix security vulnerabilities: matio (aka MAT File I/O Library) 1.5.18 through 1.5.21 has a heap-based buffer overflow in ReadInt32DataDouble (called from ReadInt32Data and Mat_VarRead4). (CVE-2020-36428) matio (aka MAT File I/O Library) 1.5.20 and 1.5.21 has a heap-based buffer overflow in H5MM_memcpy (called from H5MM_malloc and H5C_load_entry), related to use of HDF5 1.12.0. (CVE-2021-36977) References: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-36428 https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-36977 https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/security-announce@lists.opensuse.org/thread/DWEPRACQNMJHSGWUZQ5LKNVGWSZ6FMCB/ ======================== Updated packages in core/updates_testing: ======================== lib(64)matio11-1.5.23-1.mga8 lib(64)matio-devel-1.5.23-1.mga8 matio-1.5.23-1.mga8 from SRPM: matio-1.5.23-1.mga8.src.rpm Status:
NEW =>
ASSIGNED MGA8-64 MATE on Acer Aspire 5253 No installation issues. According to our MCC: "matio is an ISO C library (with a limited Fortran 90 interface) for reading and writing Matlab MAT files." So this is developers stuff, OK on clean install. I see on bug 29164 that Len did some exercise in that area, so if anyone judges it's necessary to do a similar test on this update, plse feel free to withdraw the OK. Whiteboard:
(none) =>
MGA8-64-OK Validating. Advisory in comment 1. CC:
(none) =>
andrewsfarm, sysadmin-bugs In reply to comment 2: No, you all right on this one Herman. As stated, the test in the previous bug was a very primitive one, so no worries. CC:
(none) =>
tarazed25
Dave Hodgins
2022-12-13 02:09:57 CET
CC:
(none) =>
davidwhodgins An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository. https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2022-0465.html Status:
ASSIGNED =>
RESOLVED |