| Summary: | npm has higher release on Mageia 7 than on Mageia 8 causing upgrade problems. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Dave Hodgins <davidwhodgins> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Joseph Wang <joequant> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | critical | ||
| Priority: | High | CC: | doktor5000, fri, mageia, michael, ouaurelien, sysadmin-bugs |
| Version: | 8 | Keywords: | IN_ERRATA8 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | nodejs-14.15.1-3.mga8 | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 28445 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 28393 | ||
|
Description
Dave Hodgins
2021-02-28 01:03:08 CET
Raising the priority as we have a user whose system is broken until upgrading can be finished. https://forums.mageia.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=13945&p=81682#p81682 Priority:
Normal =>
High
Florian Hubold
2021-02-28 01:33:55 CET
CC:
(none) =>
doktor5000 Adding sysadmins to cc list. Shouldn't the mga8 in the release override the lower number? CC:
(none) =>
sysadmin-bugs the mga8 bit has nothing to do with this. its npm-6.14.10 > npm-6.14.8 looks like broken package versioning, or if the npm has actually been rolled down, it should have gotten an epoch (In reply to Thomas Backlund from comment #3) > the mga8 bit has nothing to do with this. > > its npm-6.14.10 > npm-6.14.8 > > looks like broken package versioning, or if the npm has actually been rolled > down, it should have gotten an epoch epoch *bump* that is. and mga7 < mga8 is only in effect if EVR is exactly the same on both packages
Michael Slíva
2021-02-28 04:31:13 CET
CC:
(none) =>
sliva
Manuel Hiebel
2021-02-28 12:25:16 CET
Blocks:
(none) =>
28393
Morgan Leijström
2021-02-28 13:28:45 CET
CC:
(none) =>
fri i will update nodejs on mga8, i will see if this is better for the npm version. Btw mga7 update will have npm version 6.14.11 CC:
(none) =>
mageia and if still version issues we will add an epoch we won't need an epoch as new mageia 8 nodejs will have 6.14.11 too.
Manuel Hiebel
2021-02-28 19:34:26 CET
Depends on:
(none) =>
28445 I think this bug should be considered fixed because Bug 28445 is? Or are we waiting for some more? I can confirm that the bug has been fixed (In reply to Morgan Leijström from comment #9) > I think this bug should be considered fixed because Bug 28445 is? > Or are we waiting for some more? (In reply to Michael Slíva from comment #10) > I can confirm that the bug has been fixed Closing Resolution:
(none) =>
FIXED Thanks In Errata noting marked as fixed by mga8 update |