| Summary: | Unsatisfied dependency for package wireshark-libvirt when upgrading from Mageia 7 to Mageia 8. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | PC LX <mageia> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vignaud> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | major | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | luigiwalser |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | libvirt-6.10.0-1.mga8.src.rpm | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
PC LX
2020-12-19 12:19:39 CET
PC LX
2020-12-19 12:19:49 CET
Severity:
normal =>
major This is because libvirt-wireshark is dynamically linked to the Wireshark libraries, but has not been successfully rebuilt against the updated libraries in Wireshark 3.4.x. David, please bounce this if you wish, but it is difficult to avoid assigning this (against normal practice) to you; for libvirt: Fri Dec 4 by luigiwalser rebuild for wireshark [Otherwise to tv] Assignee:
bugsquad =>
luigiwalser I'll keep an eye out for a fix, but it should be assigned to the libvirt maintainer. CC:
(none) =>
luigiwalser I think this needs to be reported upstream, as it builds in Fedora, so upstream is not aware that there is an issue. (In reply to David Walser from comment #3) > I'll keep an eye out for a fix, but it should be assigned to the libvirt > maintainer. I disagree, that should be assigned to the maintainer would uploaded a new whireshark w/o fixing the fallout… It looks like it wasn't even submited to the BS… No, I didn't even know something was built against Wireshark's internal libs and was surprised by that, and Wireshark was updated because it needed to be. As it is, it almost always goes EOL before we do, so I need to have it on the newest branch I can. Combine that with the fact that other distros don't share this build issue, there was absolutely no way to expect "fallout." Either report it upstream or disable the Wireshark subpackage. But there's no fallout at all. I'd only to submit the package to the BS and that's all… I don't see the point in opening a bug report and saying we need to get in touch with upstream when all was needed was bumping the release number and submit it… Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED Actually it was submitted to the build system and the build failed. Maybe it was one of our famous random build system issues. |