| Summary: | hplip in update testing but not proposed to test | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Philippe Didier <philippedidier> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Martin Whitaker <mageia> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OLD | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | lewyssmith |
| Version: | 7 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | hplip-3.20.6-1.mga7.src.rpm | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Philippe Didier
2020-12-10 13:30:55 CET
Sorry for the rough text : I sent it too quickly I had to write first : Hello Martin and in the End Thank you for your job Well spotted, Philippe. But have you tried it? That would help. Since Martin did the update (which explains the previous comment), you are best to answer this. Source RPM:
hplip-3.20.6-1 =>
hplip-3.20.6-1.mga7.src.rpm Hi Lewis I did try it with a HP Photosmart 7520 on a 64bit system (so it's a limited test) No problem for updating the 8 rpms : hplip hplip-doc hplip-gui hplip-hpijs hplip-hpijs-ppds hplip-model-data (which allows new printers configuration) lib64hpip0 lib64sane-hpaio1 No regression using the printer or the scanner Unfortunately this is not a brand new-all-in one printer and it was already in the last database so there's nothing better to expect.... It would be useful to test this update with a new model that was not in the last database and might be in the updated one Hope this will help Thanks for your quick answer I created the update for bug 26695. I was waiting for the bug reporter to report whether it worked before assigning it to QA. Hi Martin I didn't know the bug 26695, I just discover it Thanks and congratulations for your patience and your calm (In reply to Martin Whitaker from comment #4) > I created the update for bug 26695. I was waiting for the bug reporter to > report whether it worked before assigning it to QA. Thanks for this info. I have poked that bug for a response from its author. What a difference between the two bugs... (In reply to Philippe Didier from comment #3) > I did try it with a HP Photosmart 7520 on a 64bit system (so it's a limited > test) > No problem for updating the 8 rpms : > hplip > hplip-doc > hplip-gui > hplip-hpijs > hplip-hpijs-ppds > hplip-model-data (which allows new printers configuration) > lib64hpip0 > lib64sane-hpaio1 > No regression using the printer or the scanner > Hope this will help Yes indeed, and thank you for your willingness and +ve attitude. Having checked the HP website, there's been two new releases of hplip since I prepared the update, so it's already out of date :-( As we seem to be getting close to releasing Mageia 8, and nobody appears to be demanding an update for Mageia 7, is it worth doing it now? QA are quite busy testing Mageia 8 ISOs. Hi Martin You're perfectly right We can close this bug ... no need to overwhelm the QA team if noone need this update Mageia 8 will soon be here and it's now only the only one that needs an up-to-date hplip stuff Maybe considered as resolved Thanks for your great job (I'm gonna try and test the just downloaded Beta2 ...) Thank you again for your helpful response. Resolution:
(none) =>
FIXED Yes, thank you Philippe. Hope the beta2 testing goes well! Marking as OLD because this was never pushed. Resolution:
FIXED =>
OLD |