| Summary: | Update request: mesa-19.3.4-1.mga7 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Thomas Backlund <tmb> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | QA Team <qa-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | andrewsfarm, herman.viaene, sysadmin-bugs |
| Version: | 7 | Keywords: | advisory, validated_update |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | MGA7-64-OK MGA7-32-OK | ||
| Source RPM: | mesa | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Thomas Backlund
2020-02-16 19:39:55 CET
MGA7-64 Plasma on Lenovo B50 No installation issues, only skipped the devel. Did same test as per bug 26164 with very similar result. $ glmark2 ======================================================= glmark2 2017.07 ======================================================= OpenGL Information GL_VENDOR: Intel Open Source Technology Center GL_RENDERER: Mesa DRI Intel(R) HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) GL_VERSION: 3.0 Mesa 19.3.4 ======================================================= [build] use-vbo=false: FPS: 1258 FrameTime: 0.795 ms [build] use-vbo=true: FPS: 1377 FrameTime: 0.726 ms [texture] texture-filter=nearest: FPS: 1227 FrameTime: 0.815 ms [texture] texture-filter=linear: FPS: 1232 FrameTime: 0.812 ms [texture] texture-filter=mipmap: FPS: 1249 FrameTime: 0.801 ms [shading] shading=gouraud: FPS: 1180 FrameTime: 0.847 ms [shading] shading=blinn-phong-inf: FPS: 1176 FrameTime: 0.850 ms [shading] shading=phong: FPS: 1178 FrameTime: 0.849 ms [shading] shading=cel: FPS: 1180 FrameTime: 0.847 ms [bump] bump-render=high-poly: FPS: 969 FrameTime: 1.032 ms [bump] bump-render=normals: FPS: 1313 FrameTime: 0.762 ms [bump] bump-render=height: FPS: 1303 FrameTime: 0.767 ms [effect2d] kernel=0,1,0;1,-4,1;0,1,0;: FPS: 1117 FrameTime: 0.895 ms [effect2d] kernel=1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;1,1,1,1,1;: FPS: 726 FrameTime: 1.377 ms [pulsar] light=false:quads=5:texture=false: FPS: 1260 FrameTime: 0.794 ms [desktop] blur-radius=5:effect=blur:passes=1:separable=true:windows=4: FPS: 562 FrameTime: 1.779 ms [desktop] effect=shadow:windows=4: FPS: 780 FrameTime: 1.282 ms [buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 498 FrameTime: 2.008 ms [buffer] columns=200:interleave=false:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=subdata: FPS: 420 FrameTime: 2.381 ms [buffer] columns=200:interleave=true:update-dispersion=0.9:update-fraction=0.5:update-method=map: FPS: 567 FrameTime: 1.764 ms [ideas] speed=duration: FPS: 1162 FrameTime: 0.861 ms [jellyfish] <default>: FPS: 1043 FrameTime: 0.959 ms [terrain] <default>: FPS: 131 FrameTime: 7.634 ms [shadow] <default>: FPS: 494 FrameTime: 2.024 ms [refract] <default>: FPS: 172 FrameTime: 5.814 ms [conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 1212 FrameTime: 0.825 ms [conditionals] fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=0: FPS: 1211 FrameTime: 0.826 ms [conditionals] fragment-steps=0:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1212 FrameTime: 0.825 ms [function] fragment-complexity=low:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 1217 FrameTime: 0.822 ms [function] fragment-complexity=medium:fragment-steps=5: FPS: 1221 FrameTime: 0.819 ms [loop] fragment-loop=false:fragment-steps=5:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1211 FrameTime: 0.826 ms [loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=false:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1220 FrameTime: 0.820 ms [loop] fragment-steps=5:fragment-uniform=true:vertex-steps=5: FPS: 1221 FrameTime: 0.819 ms ======================================================= glmark2 Score: 1009 ======================================================= So OK for me. CC:
(none) =>
herman.viaene Following Herman's lead, I installed glmark2 on Foolishness, my Dell Inspiron 5100, and attempted to use it to get a score for my aging gpu. It failed, and told me why in no uncertain terms. It seems that glmark2 requires Opengl 2.0, and my RV200 graphics can't handle any more than Opengl 1.3. So, I guess I'm limited to just seeing if something obvious breaks after the update. The following 8 packages are going to be installed: - libdri-drivers-19.3.4-1.mga7.i586 - libgbm1-19.3.4-1.mga7.i586 - libglapi0-19.3.4-1.mga7.i586 - libmesaegl1-19.3.4-1.mga7.i586 - libmesagl1-19.3.4-1.mga7.i586 - libmesavulkan-drivers-19.3.4-1.mga7.i586 - libxatracker2-19.3.4-1.mga7.i586 - mesa-19.3.4-1.mga7.i586 Packages installed cleanly. After a reboot, no regressions noted with kernel 5.4.17. Will test with the 5.5 series kernel later today. If I don't report back here, it's still OK CC:
(none) =>
andrewsfarm Decided to give this a try with my newest machine, i5-2500, 16GB RAM, integrated graphics. Before doing the update, I installed glmark2 and ran it:
$ glmark2
=======================================================
glmark2 2017.07
=======================================================
OpenGL Information
GL_VENDOR: Intel Open Source Technology Center
GL_RENDERER: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Sandybridge Desktop
GL_VERSION: 3.0 Mesa 19.3.3
=======================================================
(Ignoring individual test results)
=======================================================
glmark2 Score: 1046
=======================================================
Not a bad score, from what I read.
The following 8 packages are going to be installed:
- lib64dri-drivers-19.3.4-1.mga7.x86_64
- lib64gbm1-19.3.4-1.mga7.x86_64
- lib64glapi0-19.3.4-1.mga7.x86_64
- lib64mesaegl1-19.3.4-1.mga7.x86_64
- lib64mesagl1-19.3.4-1.mga7.x86_64
- lib64mesavulkan-drivers-19.3.4-1.mga7.x86_64
- lib64xatracker2-19.3.4-1.mga7.x86_64
- mesa-19.3.4-1.mga7.x86_64
Packages installed cleanly. After a reboot, I ran glmark2 again:
$ glmark2
=======================================================
glmark2 2017.07
=======================================================
OpenGL Information
GL_VENDOR: Intel Open Source Technology Center
GL_RENDERER: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Sandybridge Desktop
GL_VERSION: 3.0 Mesa 19.3.4
=======================================================
=======================================================
glmark2 Score: 1042
=======================================================
Results look pretty close to me. OK here, too.
Validating. Keywords:
(none) =>
validated_update
Thomas Backlund
2020-02-18 14:35:02 CET
Keywords:
(none) =>
advisory An update for this issue has been pushed to the Mageia Updates repository. https://advisories.mageia.org/MGAA-2020-0057.html Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |