| Summary: | ocaml-lablgtk2 needs a spec cleaning (switch BR from mesaglut-devel to freeglut-devel) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Philippe Didier <philippedidier> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | fundawang, philippedidier, pmdenielou |
| Version: | Cauldron | Keywords: | Junior_job |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | ocaml-lablgtk2 | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Philippe Didier
2011-08-28 14:07:49 CEST
Philippe Didier
2011-08-28 14:07:59 CEST
CC:
(none) =>
fundawang, philippedidier
Manuel Hiebel
2011-08-28 15:16:47 CEST
Keywords:
(none) =>
Junior_job
Jani Välimaa
2011-08-29 19:49:34 CEST
Summary:
this package needs a spec cleaning (switch BR from mesaglut-devel to freeglut-devel) =>
ocaml-lablgtk2 needs a spec cleaning (switch BR from mesaglut-devel to freeglut-devel) Funda rebuilt it without any glut stuff But ocaml-lablgl was not cleaned before... and ocaml-lablgtk2 has a BR on it... Wait and see ! Hi, Funda has cleaned ocaml-lablgl as well. We should be able to close this bug then. Best CC:
(none) =>
malo indeed thanks Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED (In reply to comment #2) > Hi, > Funda has cleaned ocaml-lablgl as well. > We should be able to close this bug then. > Best I'm not sure this reply to the problem I pointed : both ocaml-lablgl and ocaml-lablgtk2 had BuildRrequires mesa-common-devel funda have substituted to mesa-common-devel an explicit list of the mesa*-devel required... ocaml-lablgtk2 doesn't need any glut stuff that seems to be OK :) BUT ocaml-lablgtk2 has BR: ocaml-lablgl and ocaml-lablgl has now BR: freeglut-devel and was built with it september 24th BUT ocaml-lablgtk2 has been rebuilt (september 18th) BEFORE ocaml-lablgl was rebuilt with freeglut-devel SO ocaml-lablgtk2 that doesn't need GLUT by itself has been built with a source (ocaml-labgl-devel) that was still built with mesaglut (not yet corrected) MAYBE it's not a problem ? MAYBE it's a problem ? If nobody knows, MAYBE it would be better to rebuild packages having BR: ocaml-lablgl that were pushed before ocaml-lablgl was cleaned... ocaml-lablgtk2 is the only package having BR ocaml-lablgl ... it's not a huge work to push it again if necessary :) that's all what I meant in comment1 that was perhaps too concise ... Status:
RESOLVED =>
REOPENED I understand. There is a need for a rebuild of lablgtk and its dependencies. Ocaml packages are very sensitive to that. I'm on it. It however only affects the programs if they use the GtkGlArea module as far as I can guess. And it's not the case of ocamlgraph, unison, mldonkey or plplot (the only dependencies of lalbgtk so far). Best this bug can be now closed as resolved fixed : Funda rebuilt ocaml-lablgtk2 : 2011 october 2nd : Revision 150919 Status:
REOPENED =>
RESOLVED |