| Summary: | dnf autoremove and urpme --auto-orphans don't return the same things | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | peter lawford <petlaw726> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Neal Gompa <ngompa13> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OLD | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | ouaurelien |
| Version: | 6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | CVE: | ||
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
peter lawford
2019-09-03 11:59:04 CEST
> dnf autoremove and urpme --auto-orphans don't return the same things
I suppose they should?
Trying this on Mageia 7, alas with no orphans available, gave identical results:
# dnf autoremove
Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:13 ago on Dydd Mawrth 03 mis Medi 2019 21:32:58 CEST.
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!
# urpme --auto-orphans
Dim pecynnau amddifad i'w tynnu [no orphans to remove]
Assigning to Neal for dnf.Summary:
dnf remove and urpme --auto-orphans don't return the same things =>
dnf autoremove and urpme --auto-orphans don't return the same things (In reply to Lewis Smith from comment #1) > > dnf autoremove and urpme --auto-orphans don't return the same things > I suppose they should? > > Trying this on Mageia 7, alas with no orphans available, gave identical > results: > # dnf autoremove > Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:13 ago on Dydd Mawrth 03 mis Medi 2019 > 21:32:58 CEST. > Dependencies resolved. > Nothing to do. > Complete! > # urpme --auto-orphans > Dim pecynnau amddifad i'w tynnu [no orphans to remove] > > Assigning to Neal for dnf. is this language gaelic? am I true? if there is no orphans, the fact that dnf remove and urpme --auto-orphans give the same result is obvious, but in the case here considered, why dnf remove didn't make its job? If packages were not installed by DNF, DNF assumes they were user-installed, and so they will *not* necessarily be eligible for consideration for dnf autoremove. Were the packages in question installed by urpmi or dnf? (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #3) > If packages were not installed by DNF, DNF assumes they were user-installed, > and so they will *not* necessarily be eligible for consideration for dnf > autoremove. > > Were the packages in question installed by urpmi or dnf? I don't think there is 2 sorts of pkgs, those installed with dnf and those installed with urpmi; a package is a package, either it is an orphan either it is not (In reply to peter lawford from comment #4) > I don't think there is 2 sorts of pkgs, those installed with dnf and those > installed with urpmi; a package is a package, either it is an orphan either > it is not Yes but as with metadata,i suppose that databases of urpmi and dnf are different Hi, thanks for reporting this bug. We are sorry, but we no longer maintains this version of Mageia. Please upgrade to the latest version and reopen this bug against that version if this bug exists there. As a result we are setting this bug to CLOSED:OLD Resolution:
(none) =>
OLD |