Bug 2436

Summary: feff, front-end for FFmpeg.
Product: Mageia Reporter: Dimitrios Glentadakis <dglent>
Component: New RPM package requestAssignee: Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact:
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: Normal CC: andr55, doktor5000, marja11, misc, oliver.bgr
Version: CauldronKeywords: PATCH
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php/Feff?content=140298
Whiteboard: X
Source RPM: feff CVE:
Status comment:

Description Dimitrios Glentadakis 2011-08-16 13:08:03 CEST
I'd like to propose this application to be added at mageia's repository:

http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php/Feff?content=140298

Description:
Front-end for FFmpeg.



I have allready a srpm here:
http://mageia-gr.org/rpm/1/SRPMS/feff-1.4-1mgr1.src.rpm

Thanks
Marja Van Waes 2011-11-03 20:50:59 CET

Keywords: (none) => PATCH
URL: (none) => http://qt-apps.org/content/show.php/Feff?content=140298
CC: (none) => marja11
Summary: Request to add the feff rpm => feff, front-end for FFmpeg.
Source RPM: (none) => feff
Severity: normal => enhancement

Comment 1 Marja Van Waes 2011-12-29 14:26:51 CET
You're on the list of Mageia packagers
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Packaging#Packaging_team

but you don't seem to maintain any
http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/data/maintdb.txt

Wouldn't it be an idea to import this one and maintain it yourself?
Comment 2 Dimitrios Glentadakis 2011-12-29 20:33:46 CET
Yes off course i can do this. I had asked before to maintain certain rpm that i know that i am able to do (them present in the repo that i maintain), and i had a "negative" answer (to be more explicit i was be suggested to continue maintain my community repository, is better than participate to the official repos packaging) so i continue maintain the mageia-gr.org repository and i ask here for the rpm to be imported each time.
Comment 3 Florian Hubold 2011-12-29 22:22:34 CET
(In reply to comment #2)
> and i had
> a "negative" answer (to be more explicit i was be suggested to continue
> maintain my community repository, is better than participate to the official
> repos packaging) so i continue maintain the mageia-gr.org repository and i ask
> here for the rpm to be imported each time.

Would you mind sharing a link or something to that answer?

Normally 3rd party repos are discouraged, because we want those people to work directly on Mageia packages and to import their packages, like for example the blogdrake guys are doing.

CC: (none) => doktor5000

Comment 4 Dimitrios Glentadakis 2011-12-30 06:11:25 CET
I dont have any link, it was a discussion that i had with Michael Shearer in #mageia-devel last year. I asked if there is any need to ask for a mentor, or is better to continue sharing the rpm that i maintain, in the local community repo. Michael told me that is better to continue share them from the local community repo.
It is ok i dont have any problem with this, but some packages i find them usefull and if they are included in the official repos is a + for the distribution and for other users that maybe wants them, so i asked here to be imported if you agree.
andré blais 2011-12-30 06:56:55 CET

CC: (none) => andre999mga

Comment 5 Marja Van Waes 2011-12-30 07:41:41 CET
(In reply to comment #4)
> I dont have any link, it was a discussion that i had with Michael Shearer in
> #mageia-devel last year. I asked if there is any need to ask for a mentor, or
> is better to continue sharing the rpm that i maintain, in the local community
> repo. Michael told me that is better to continue share them from the local
> community repo.
> It is ok i dont have any problem with this, but some packages i find them
> usefull and if they are included in the official repos is a + for the
> distribution and for other users that maybe wants them, so i asked here to be
> imported if you agree.

So that was at least a year ago, he might think differently now. Anyway, we are short on packagers and I think it would be great if you got a mentor and would start packaging directly for Mageia.

cc'ing misc

CC: (none) => misc

Comment 6 Michael Scherer 2011-12-31 10:44:56 CET
I do not have log, but my point was rather :
- we have some rules regarding what goes , and we have some good reasons to have those rules ( reasons like "needed for quality" ( quality itself that was requested repeatedly by users ) ). And while I think we should avoid 3rd parties repositories, I perfectly know that they are unavoidable, because no matter how much or how few rules you place, there will always be conflicts leading to them ( with enough packagers, that's unavoidable ).

So now, I have nothing against Dimitrios becoming packager, but I think that if the goal is to maintain backports, or to push software that we cannot ship, that's not the time for that ( and unless some laws change drastically, people will wait quite a long time ), and he would be better to be outside of Mageia. However, there is still useful stuff to do, like making sure that no backports are needed in the next version by taking care of the software, and keeping them up to date. Or by making sure that the rpm we can ship needed by those we cannot are shipped.
Comment 7 Dimitrios Glentadakis 2012-01-02 21:10:54 CET
I would like to provide more but unfortunately in packaging this is all that i can offer. My only goal is to help and contribute the most i can for the best of Mageia as i follow the distribution since many years (mandriva) and i do trust the same persons.
Comment 8 Marja Van Waes 2012-01-02 22:22:00 CET
(In reply to comment #7)
> My only goal is to help and contribute the most i can for the best
> of Mageia as i follow the distribution since many years (mandriva) and i do
> trust the same persons.

And that is good. I'm very glad your name is on the list of apprentice candidates, now :)
Marja Van Waes 2012-02-17 16:39:03 CET

Whiteboard: (none) => X

Comment 9 Dimitrios Glentadakis 2012-02-17 18:33:29 CET
A very good alternative of a conversion program is the ffmulticonverter
http://pkgs.org/mageia-cauldron/mageia-core-release-i586/ffmulticonverter-1.2.0-1.mga2.noarch.rpm.html
(just imported in mageia)

I close this bug if there is no objection

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => WONTFIX

Comment 10 Dimitrios Glentadakis 2012-06-22 20:09:01 CEST
The version 1.9 has some sinificatives improvement and it seems that this project will have a good future.
I imported the rpm: 
http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages?view=revision&revision=262670

I added Oliver Burger to verify the rpm.

Status: RESOLVED => REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX => (none)

Dimitrios Glentadakis 2012-06-24 08:13:30 CEST

CC: (none) => oliver.bgr

Comment 11 Oliver Burger 2012-07-11 08:24:20 CEST
Submitted.

I did some (little) changes to your spec file.
Please check and ask me about them, when unsure why I did them.

Status: REOPENED => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED

Comment 12 Dimitrios Glentadakis 2012-07-11 20:48:38 CEST
Thanks Oliver, ok, i see that i did n't set the attributes for the desktop file to 644, i have to remember next time.