| Summary: | task-printing-* still requires gutenprint-ijs and gutenprint-foomatic, even if gutenprint upstream already removed ijs and foomatic in gutenprint-5.2.12 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Juan Magallon <jamagallon> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | All Packagers <pkg-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | fri, marja11, thomas.bigot |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | task-printing-scanning-2011-11.mga7.src.rpm | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Juan Magallon
2018-01-18 16:39:18 CET
Indeed, thanks for the report. The Foomatic data generator and the Ghostscript IJS driver had already been removed in version 5.2.12, that landed in cauldron almost 8 months ago. Both gutenprint-ijs and gutenprint-foomatic are mentioned 5 times as Requires in task-printing-scanning.spec Assigning to all packagers collectively, since there is no registered maintainer for task-printing-scanning Summary:
task-printing still requires ijs =>
task-printing-* still requires gutenprint-ijs and gutenprint-foomatic, even if gutenprint upstream already urremoved ijs and foomatic in gutenprint-5.2.12
Marja Van Waes
2018-01-18 21:14:12 CET
Summary:
task-printing-* still requires gutenprint-ijs and gutenprint-foomatic, even if gutenprint upstream already urremoved ijs and foomatic in gutenprint-5.2.12 =>
task-printing-* still requires gutenprint-ijs and gutenprint-foomatic, even if gutenprint upstream already removed ijs and foomatic in gutenprint-5.2.12 Would this affect more than just Cauldron then? (In reply to David Walser from comment #2) > Would this affect more than just Cauldron then? I don't thinks so, I don't find gutenprint-5.2.12 in my local copy of the Mageia 6 repositories [marja@localhost ~]$ find /RedHD2/mageia/distrib/6/SRPMS/core/ | grep gutenprint /RedHD2/mageia/distrib/6/SRPMS/core/release/gutenprint-5.2.11-2.mga6.src.rpm [marja@localhost ~]$ But there is something that I don't understand ==> "mgarepo log 6/gutenprint" shows: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1123324 | umeabot | 2017-07-14 15:58:43 +0200 (vr, 14 jul 2017) | 1 line SILENT Branching for Mageia 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1017383 | luigiwalser | 2016-05-21 18:24:17 +0200 (za, 21 mei 2016) | 1 line SILENT: add missing part of patch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1017382 | luigiwalser | 2016-05-21 18:14:27 +0200 (za, 21 mei 2016) | 3 lines - add upstream patch to use pkgconfig instead of ijs-config to find ijs - call autoreconf instead of non-existent autogen.sh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1011380 | luigiwalser | 2016-05-09 17:58:20 +0200 (ma, 09 mei 2016) | 1 line 5.2.11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ==> It lacks the 5.2.12 entry that "magerepo log gutenprint" does show: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1144557 | ovitters | 2017-08-23 23:54:47 +0200 (wo, 23 aug 2017) | 1 line SILENT convert -devel buildrequires into pkgconfig ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1102216 | luigiwalser | 2017-05-16 23:07:37 +0200 (di, 16 mei 2017) | 4 lines - 5.2.12 - rediff patch 4 - remove patch 6 (ijs driver has been removed) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1017383 | luigiwalser | 2016-05-21 18:24:17 +0200 (za, 21 mei 2016) | 1 line SILENT: add missing part of patch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ==> The 5.2.12 entry has an older time stamp than the "Branching for Mageia 6" time stamp I'm confused :-( Branching is done after last successful build available in repo, not after latest revision in SVN. 'mgarepo rpmlog 6/gutenprint' shows that mga6's gutenprint was build from r1017383 in SVN. So the branching was done after that revision.
Thomas Bigot
2018-03-02 10:30:33 CET
CC:
(none) =>
thomas.bigot Seem to be OK in mga7 now. Resolution:
(none) =>
FIXED |