Bug 22194

Summary: Cant install JavaFX, because the matching OpenJDK version is missing
Product: Mageia Reporter: Juan Magallon <jamagallon>
Component: RPM PackagesAssignee: Nicolas Salguero <nicolas.salguero>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: Normal CC: mageia, marja11
Version: Cauldron   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Source RPM: java-1.8.0-openjfx-1.8.0.152-1.b16.2.mga7, java-1.8.0-openjdk CVE:
Status comment:

Description Juan Magallon 2017-12-15 13:26:13 CET 
If I try to install JavaFX:

# urpmi java-1.8.0-openjfx
A requested package cannot be installed:
java-1.8.0-openjfx-1.8.0.152-1.b16.2.mga7.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied java-1.8.0-openjdk[== 1:1.8.0.151-1.b12.1.mga7])
Continue installation anyway? (Y/n) y
While some packages may have been installed, there were failures.
A requested package cannot be installed:
java-1.8.0-openjfx-1.8.0.152-1.b16.2.mga7.x86_64 (due to unsatisfied java-1.8.0-openjdk[== 1:1.8.0.151-1.b12.1.mga7])
Continue installation anyway?

Problem is that this new OpenJFX seems part of a Java update that did not reach the mirrors. OpenJDK version in mirrors is this:

java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.141-1.b16.1.mga7 x86_64
java-1.8.0-openjdk-demo-1.8.0.141-1.b16.1.mga7 x86_64
java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-1.8.0.141-1.b16.1.mga7 x86_64
java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.141-1.b16.1.mga7 x86_64
java-1.8.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.8.0.141-1.b16.1.mga7 noarch

There is no -152 update.
Comment 1 Marja Van Waes 2017-12-16 08:58:46 CET 
Assigning to the registered java-1.8.0-openjfx maintainer. CC'ing the registered java-1.8.0-openjdk maintainer.

Summary: Cant install JavaFX => Cant install JavaFX, because the matching OpenJDK version is missing
CC: (none) => mageia, marja11
Source RPM: java-1.8.0-openjfx-1.8.0.152-1.b16.2.mga7.src.rpm => java-1.8.0-openjfx-1.8.0.152-1.b16.2.mga7, java-1.8.0-openjdk
Assignee: bugsquad => nicolas.salguero

Comment 2 David Walser 2017-12-16 21:37:37 CET 
This is because the openjdk update failed to build and nobody helped fix it.
Comment 3 Nicolas Salguero 2017-12-19 15:51:22 CET 
Hi,

Openjdk update is now built so the problem will be over as soon as the packages land on mirrors.

Best regards,

Nico.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED