| Summary: | Add igraph to Core Backports | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Kristoffer Grundström <lovaren> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | lewyssmith, lovaren, marja11 |
| Version: | Cauldron | Keywords: | Backport |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | igraph | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Kristoffer Grundström
2017-12-12 01:54:46 CET
Kristoffer Grundström
2017-12-12 01:55:43 CET
CC:
(none) =>
hamnisdude We do have igraph in cauldron, which seems to be the C version... I don't understand why there are also python and R versions of igraph. I suppose the C version should do everything the python version does, since igraph was imported into cauldron because of your request for python-igraph in bug 21312 Changing this report into a backport request for stable and assigning to the igraph maintainer. Priority:
High =>
Normal igraph backport submitted to mga6 - pls test. @ Kristoffer : you did not reply to the previous comment - which answered your request. We are now in Mageia 7, which has igraph. Do you want to comment on this, or shall we close the bug? CC:
(none) =>
lewyssmith Uhm. I'm not really sure if igraph and python's igraph package use the same source. (In reply to Kristoffer Grundström from comment #4) > I'm not really sure if igraph and python's igraph package use the same > source. Does this matter? If Mageia's 'igraph' package does the job, what would be the advantage of adding 'python-igraph' - if indeed that is different? The bug title says "Add igraph": resolved, fixed (comment 2, 2018). The description talks about 'Tribler client' - which we do not seem to have; so the related "python-igraph ... listed as a require" is not the issue. Do you agree? (In reply to Lewis Smith from comment #5) > (In reply to Kristoffer Grundström from comment #4) > > I'm not really sure if igraph and python's igraph package use the same > > source. > Does this matter? If Mageia's 'igraph' package does the job, what would be > the advantage of adding 'python-igraph' - if indeed that is different? > > The bug title says "Add igraph": resolved, fixed (comment 2, 2018). > The description talks about 'Tribler client' - which we do not seem to have; > so the related "python-igraph ... listed as a require" is not the issue. > > Do you agree? The differences between igraph and python-igraph according to people in the #python channel on IRC is: The genode. igraph is a C library whilst python-igraph is a python interface to it, but I get your point if it actually does the same. Good. Resolution:
(none) =>
FIXED |