Bug 21529

Summary: ksudoku requires libs from qt4 and qt5
Product: Mageia Reporter: papoteur <yvesbrungard>
Component: RPM PackagesAssignee: KDE maintainers <kde>
Status: RESOLVED INVALID QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: Normal CC: geiger.david68210, marja11
Version: 6   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Source RPM: ksudoku CVE:
Status comment:

Description papoteur 2017-08-14 07:58:00 CEST 
Installing ksudoku requires 
lib64kdeclarative5
lib64kdeclarative4
Are these two versions really needed?

LC_ALL=C urpmi ksudoku
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
  Package                        Version      Release       Arch    
(medium "Core Release")
  ksudoku                        16.12.3      1.mga6        x86_64  
  ksudoku-handbook               16.12.3      1.mga6        noarch  (recommended)
  lib64kdeclarative5             4.14.30      2.mga6        x86_64  
  lib64kdegames6                 14.12.3      3.mga6        x86_64  
  lib64kdegamesprivate1          14.12.3      3.mga6        x86_64  
  lib64kdnssd4                   4.14.30      2.mga6        x86_64  
  lib64knewstuff3_4              4.14.30      2.mga6        x86_64  
  lib64qtdeclarative4            4.8.7        15.mga6       x86_64  
  lib64qtxmlpatterns4            4.8.7        15.mga6       x86_64  
  libkdegames4                   14.12.3      3.mga6        x86_64  
  qt4-xmlpatterns                4.8.7        15.mga6       x86_64  
44MB of additional disk space will be used.
9.4MB of packages will be retrieved.
Proceed with the installation of the 11 packages? (Y/n)
Comment 1 David GEIGER 2017-08-14 15:07:33 CEST 
Err!

It is lib64kdeclarative5 and lib64qtdeclarative4 (not lib64kdeclarative4)

CC: (none) => geiger.david68210

Marja Van Waes 2017-08-14 21:17:04 CEST

Assignee: bugsquad => kde
CC: (none) => marja11

Comment 2 papoteur 2017-08-14 22:00:48 CEST 
@David.
Thanks.
Thus, for you, all is OK?
Comment 3 David GEIGER 2017-08-14 22:23:03 CEST 
Yes all is ok! all libs are Qt4 :)
Comment 4 David Walser 2017-08-19 00:20:51 CEST 
Can we close this as INVALID then?
Comment 5 David GEIGER 2017-08-19 07:30:48 CEST 
Yes I close it now as INVALID

Resolution: (none) => INVALID
Status: NEW => RESOLVED