| Summary: | Let kernel-firmware obsolete microcode_ctl? (was: update-microcode fails during monthly cron) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Stefan Puch <s.puch> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Kernel and Drivers maintainers <kernel> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | lists.jjorge, marja11, tmb |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | MGA5TOO | ||
| Source RPM: | microcode_ctl-2.1-4.mga5.src.rpm | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Stefan Puch
2017-03-01 11:42:46 CET
David Walser
2017-03-01 12:07:49 CET
CC:
(none) =>
lists.jjorge (In reply to Stefan Puch from comment #0) > > > According to the URL in the src.rpm http://fedorahosted.org/microcode_ctl > > "Please be advised microcode_ctl is obsolete and v2.0+ is the temporary > solution. Future microcode updates will be delivered through the > kernel-firmware infrastructure." > The fedorahosted link no longer works. "fedorahosted.org will be retired on 2017-02-28. If you are viewinng this page, odds are it's after that date and you have been redirected here by attempting to go to some project on fedorahosted.org." And https://pagure.io/microcode_ctl only says: This repo is brand new! The Project Creator has not pushed any code yet > > I don't know if the rpm could safely be dropped? I don't know whether something should be done while building kernel-firmware* to enable the microcode control functionality Assigning to the kernel maintainers. CC:
(none) =>
marja11 Yeah, linux-firmware git carries the microcodes for both Amd and Intel. I have kept the microcode* packages separate from kernel-firmware-nonfree as it was easier to ship a small firmware rpm as an update, than pushing a full nonfree update just for a couple of updated microcodes (like I also do for radeon-firmware) (to save people from downloading firmware rpms that has not really changed). But now I guess its time to rework the kernel-firmware script to redo the firmware sources tarballs to cover for the microcodes too. CC:
(none) =>
tmb > I don't know if the rpm could safely be dropped? OK, I assumed that the same microcodes are available through the rpm microcode-0.20161104-1.mga5.nonfree which seems to be up-to-date (Bug 20228). (In reply to Thomas Backlund from comment #2) > But now I guess its time to rework the kernel-firmware script to redo the > firmware sources tarballs to cover for the microcodes too. Please note I have reworked the microcode rpm in MGA6 to add firmwares from old CPUs, that are no more in the intel tarball. Please ensure they are all in kernel before you obsolete microcode. |