Bug 20301

Summary: gssproxy.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=1
Product: Mageia Reporter: Bit Twister <bittwister2>
Component: RPM PackagesAssignee: Guillaume Rousse <guillomovitch>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: Normal CC: marja11
Version: CauldronKeywords: 6sta2
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Source RPM: gssproxy-0.6.1-1.mga6.src.rpm CVE:
Status comment:
Attachments: /etc/gssproxy/gssproxy.conf

Description Bit Twister 2017-02-16 13:59:42 CET
Description of problem:

$ journalctl --no-hostname | grep gssproxy
Feb 16 02:48:14 systemd[1]:
            gssproxy.service: Control process exited, code=exited status=1
            gssproxy.service: Unit entered failed state.
            gssproxy.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. create /etc/gssproxy/gssproxy.conf   See attachment
2. systemctl restart gssproxy.service
3. journalctl --no-hostname | grep gssproxy
Comment 1 Bit Twister 2017-02-16 14:01:58 CET
Created attachment 8964 [details]
/etc/gssproxy/gssproxy.conf
Bit Twister 2017-02-16 14:02:29 CET

Keywords: (none) => 6sta2

Marja Van Waes 2017-02-16 15:30:15 CET

CC: (none) => marja11
Assignee: bugsquad => guillomovitch

Comment 2 Guillaume Rousse 2017-05-07 18:34:28 CEST
Either update to 0.7.0, once submitted, or remove the nfs-server part of your configuration file, which seems to be the cause of the start failure.

Status: NEW => ASSIGNED

Comment 3 Bit Twister 2017-05-07 23:08:40 CEST
(In reply to Guillaume Rousse from comment #2)
> Either update to 0.7.0, once submitted, 

I did the update and reboot.
Still failed with code=exited status=1

> or remove the nfs-server part of
> your configuration file,

Did it, rebooted, still failed.

> which seems to be the cause of the start failure.

Also, removed the nfs-client stanza and no start failure.
Also restored the original configuration file and have no start failure.

The main reason for the bug report was to get the application to indicate what it did not like.

Feel free to close this as won't fix if you like.
Comment 4 Guillaume Rousse 2017-05-26 12:52:21 CEST
Well, you'd better report this issue upstream if you want to change its behaviour, I don't have any added-value here.

Resolution: (none) => WONTFIX
Status: ASSIGNED => RESOLVED