| Summary: | Issues to post to dev mailing list | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Infrastructure | Reporter: | Chris Denice <eatdirt> |
| Component: | Others | Assignee: | Sysadmin Team <sysadmin-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | major | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | marja11, pterjan, sysadmin-bugs |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | I don't know | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Chris Denice
2016-08-28 17:09:55 CEST
I don't receive your messages, either, but when I manage to use the send back option on ml.mageia.org, then they end up in my spam box, because of
X-XS4ALL-Spam-Warning: Message moved to Spam location because of DMARC policy
of protonmail.com
However, xs4all shouldn't bounce Mageia ml mails because of dmarc policies, and they still let the Yahoo DMARC ml mails of David Walser through, so I cannot understand what's going on.CC:
(none) =>
marja11 It seems to trigger a problem with sympa because of having Message-ID longer than 100 characters:
# grep bulkspool_table /var/log/mail/errors.log
Aug 28 16:47:53 alamut sympa[11177]: err Bulk::store() Unable to add message in bulkspool_table "INSERT INTO bulkspool_table (messagekey_bulkspool, messageid_bulkspool, message_bulkspool, lock_bulkspool, dkim_d_bulkspool, dkim_i_bulkspool, dkim_selector_bulkspool, dkim_privatekey_bulkspool, dkim_header_list_bulkspool) VALUES ('e850aa36ea37560d83de88e8eb7e9674', '<ISgNZf3Fhlz1okmiSt-w5QqF2r4tfbbCKPSQ7N-ZJtV5QOQgq4w9Zo3ANTyGI-Vmvub24wKglR_hw2IJ3AQZSA==@protonmail.com>', 'UmV0dXJuLVBhdGg6IDxlYXRkaXJ0QHByb3Rvbm1haWwuY29tPgpSZWNlaXZlZDogZnJvbSBsb2Nh#012bGhvc3QgKGxvY2FsaG9zdCB', 1, NULL ,NULL ,NULL, '', NULL)"; error : ERROR: value too long for type character varying(100)
Aug 28 16:47:54 alamut sympa[11177]: err Bulk::store() Unable to add message in bulkspool_table "INSERT INTO bulkspool_table (messagekey_bulkspool, messageid_bulkspool, message_bulkspool, lock_bulkspool, dkim_d_bulkspool, dkim_i_bulkspool, dkim_selector_bulkspool, dkim_privatekey_bulkspool, dkim_header_list_bulkspool) VALUES ('c48c25d8995132b21aa8e2da629bc1c7', '<ISgNZf3Fhlz1okmiSt-w5QqF2r4tfbbCKPSQ7N-ZJtV5QOQgq4w9Zo3ANTyGI-Vmvub24wKglR_hw2IJ3AQZSA==@protonmail.com>', 'TUlNRS1WZXJzaW9uOiAxLjAKQXV0by1TdWJtaXR0ZWQ6IGF1dG8tcmVwbGllZApGcm9tOiBTWU1Q#012QSA8c3ltcGFAbWwubWFnZWl', 1, NULL ,NULL ,NULL, '', NULL)"; error : ERROR: value too long for type character varying(100)
Aug 29 21:48:52 alamut sympa[11177]: err Bulk::store() Unable to add message in bulkspool_table "INSERT INTO bulkspool_table (messagekey_bulkspool, messageid_bulkspool, message_bulkspool, lock_bulkspool, dkim_d_bulkspool, dkim_i_bulkspool, dkim_selector_bulkspool, dkim_privatekey_bulkspool, dkim_header_list_bulkspool) VALUES ('e025b7d1742ce6c544c11e280f3f43fa', '<wVMak2HRkcN4G9QQoJ_Y1h8YyKDNBifg_PKRpn2MHObBwI3cH04x3MOTlhwfXjwq9ocDknAKlypIVaGzZv7CwQ==@protonmail.com>', 'UmV0dXJuLVBhdGg6IDxlYXRkaXJ0QHByb3Rvbm1haWwuY29tPgpSZWNlaXZlZDogZnJvbSBsb2Nh#012bGhvc3QgKGxvY2FsaG9zdCB', 1, NULL ,NULL ,NULL, '', NULL)"; error : ERROR: value too long for type character varying(100)
Aug 29 21:48:53 alamut sympa[11177]: err Bulk::store() Unable to add message in bulkspool_table "INSERT INTO bulkspool_table (messagekey_bulkspool, messageid_bulkspool, message_bulkspool, lock_bulkspool, dkim_d_bulkspool, dkim_i_bulkspool, dkim_selector_bulkspool, dkim_privatekey_bulkspool, dkim_header_list_bulkspool) VALUES ('f660fa585b9d7d91847de37208db53f9', '<wVMak2HRkcN4G9QQoJ_Y1h8YyKDNBifg_PKRpn2MHObBwI3cH04x3MOTlhwfXjwq9ocDknAKlypIVaGzZv7CwQ==@protonmail.com>', 'TUlNRS1WZXJzaW9uOiAxLjAKQXV0by1TdWJtaXR0ZWQ6IGF1dG8tcmVwbGllZApGcm9tOiBTWU1Q#012QSA8c3ltcGFAbWwubWFnZWl', 1, NULL ,NULL ,NULL, '', NULL)"; error : ERROR: value too long for type character varying(100)
This looks like a bug in sympa as I am not aware of such limitation on Message-ID length in RFCs.CC:
(none) =>
pterjan It seems this is no longer stored in DB starting in Sympa 6.2, so I guess another problem that will get fixed when we manage to upgrade... Or maybe not, as we switched to 6.2 for Mageia 6 but Mageia 5 still has 6.1.x,,, |