| Summary: | [6RC] adjusting "konsole" window size when using urpmi changes the way urpmi reports download % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Ben McMonagle <westel> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | KDE maintainers <kde> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Low | CC: | mageia, marja11, thierry.vignaud |
| Version: | Cauldron | Keywords: | 6sta1.5 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i586 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | konsole, urpmi | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
| Attachments: |
how urpmi should report downloaded packages
example of how urpmi reports downloaded % of package if konsole window is too small |
||
|
Description
Ben McMonagle
2016-08-11 10:43:59 CEST
Ben McMonagle
2016-08-11 10:44:20 CEST
Keywords:
(none) =>
6RC Created attachment 8326 [details]
how urpmi should report downloaded packages
Created attachment 8327 [details]
example of how urpmi reports downloaded % of package if konsole window is too small
(In reply to ben mcmonagle from comment #2) > Created attachment 8327 [details] > example of how urpmi reports downloaded % of package if konsole window is > too small You don't get that when you start urpmi in a small konsole window, but only when you make it smaller after starting urpmi, correct? If the latter, then to me that doesn't count as a bug.... or was this different in Mga 1-5 ? Keywords:
(none) =>
NEEDINFO (In reply to Marja van Waes from comment #3) > only > when you make it smaller after starting urpmi, correct? yes > was this > different in Mga 1-5 ? same in M5 Thx for the feedback, Ben. Changing Severity to Enhancement Keywords:
NEEDINFO =>
(none) Guessing that *if* this can be enhanced at all, that it should happen on konsole side, so assigning to neoclust, who'll happily reassign if needed, or tell it can't be done if that's the case. Assignee:
bugsquad =>
mageia
Samuel Verschelde
2016-08-25 16:23:51 CEST
Assignee:
mageia =>
kde is it still valid on current cauldron ? (In reply to Nicolas Lécureuil from comment #7) > is it still valid on current cauldron ? Over half a year later, no reply. Assuming this got fixed. Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |