Bug 18544

In report.bug.xz that was attached to bug 18520 - see attachment 7840 [details] - I saw that among the many "unknown packages", there were several libreoffice ones. 

[marja@cldrn_64 Downloads]$ xzcat bug18520report.bug.xz | grep "unknown package" | grep libreoffice
* unknown package `libreoffice-style-tango'
* unknown package `libreoffice-presenter-screen'
* unknown package `libreoffice-kde'
* unknown package `libreoffice-presentation-minimizer'
* unknown package `libreoffice-report-builder'
* unknown package `libreoffice-gnome'
[marja@cldrn_64 Downloads]$

Later in the logs, there are 30 libreoffice* packages that get unselected:

[marja@cldrn_64 Downloads]$ xzcat bug18520report.bug.xz | grep unselecting | grep libreoffice | wc -l
30
[marja@cldrn_64 Downloads]$

CC: (none) => marja11
Assignee: bugsquad => thierry.vignaud

confirming the absence of L.O in i586

CC: (none) => westel

checking the list of missing package :
all of them except libreoffice-kde do not exist anymore in repository.
we do have libreoffice-kde4

so rpmsrate file is not up to date

err I think the issue is that eg libreoffice-writer wasn't installed, isnt' it?
Cleaning rpmsrate is just additional bonus

Problem is rather below

* chosen libreoffice-ure-5.1.3.2-5.mga6.i586 for libuno_sal.so.3
* selecting libreoffice-ure-5.1.3.2-5.mga6.i586
* requiring libjvm.so,unzip(x86-32) for libreoffice-ure-5.1.3.2-5.mga6.i586
* chosen java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.91-1.b14.1.mga6.i586 for libjvm.so
* selecting java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.91-1.b14.1.mga6.i586
* requiring /usr/sbin/alternatives[*],copy-jdk-configs[>= 1.1-1],jpackage-utils,lksctp-tools,rootcerts-java,timezone-java[>= 2015d] for java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.91-1.b14.1.mga6.i586
* no packages match /usr/sbin/alternatives[*] (it is either in skip.list or already rejected)
* unselecting java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.91-1.b14.1.mga6.i586
* unselecting libreoffice-ure-5.1.3.2-5.mga6.i586
* unselecting libreoffice-math-5.1.3.2-5.mga6.i586
* unselecting libreoffice-pyuno-5.1.3.2-5.mga6.i586
* adding a reason to already rejected package java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.91-1.b14.1.mga6.i586: unsatisfied /usr/sbin/alternatives[*]

I would have though that a missing update-alternatives pkg would have broken quite a lot more stuff...
But why bcd doesn't ensure all deps are on the images?

Source RPM: classical isos dtd 20 May 2016 => classical isos dtd 20 May 2016, bcd

Well it's based on rpmcheck. It should have shout some nice messages. Seems not...

Fixed now by neoclust http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages?view=revision&revision=1018932

Build in progress

Ah file deps strike again...
But we should requires "update-alternatives" (so called "virtual provides") instead of "chkconfig"

CC: (none) => mageia

Valid for latest iso (64 bits)

Source RPM: classical isos dtd 20 May 2016, bcd => classical isos dtd 06 Jun 2016

Please provide the debug logs

Created attachment 7939 [details]
requested report.bug.xz

* selecting timezone-java-2016d-1.mga6.noarch
* no packages match /usr/sbin/alternatives[*] (it is either in skip.list or already rejected)
* unselecting java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.91-1.b14.2.mga6.x86_64
* unselecting libreoffice-ure-5.1.3.2-6.mga6.x86_64
* unselecting libreoffice-pyuno-5.1.3.2-6.mga6.x86_64
* unselecting libreoffice-draw-5.1.3.2-6.mga6.x86_64

Same player, shoot again... Looks we are back with it

not sure if this is relevent.

single i586 DE install of Mate.
L/O installed correctly: calc, draw, impress, math, writer + main launcher

Mageia-6-sta1-i586-DVD.iso
DATE.txt: Mon Jun  6 23:20:56 CEST 2016

Created attachment 7948 [details]
i586 Mate single DE report.bug.xz

old

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED