| Summary: | memtest86+ fails to run on UEFI system (unsupported) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Barry Jackson <zen25000> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | All Packagers <pkg-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | critical | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | bequimao.de, jarillon, javier_diaz, lists.jjorge, marja11, thierry.vignaud, tmb |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18261 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | memtest86+ | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Barry Jackson
2016-05-22 18:11:33 CEST
Hmm..
I just found this in 20_memtest86+ script in Fedora's package:
if [ -d /sys/firmware/efi ]; then
echo "ERROR: memtest86+ does not support EFI platforms."
exit 254
fi
Barry Jackson
2016-05-22 18:30:13 CEST
Summary:
memtest86+ fails to run =>
memtest86+ fails to run on UEFI system (In reply to Barry Jackson from comment #1) > Hmm.. > > I just found this in 20_memtest86+ script in Fedora's package: > > if [ -d /sys/firmware/efi ]; then > echo "ERROR: memtest86+ does not support EFI platforms." > exit 254 > fi Assigning to all packagers collectively, since there is no maintainer for this package. CC:
(none) =>
marja11 OK I think I have a solution for this issue. 1. If we remove the "Recommends: memtest86+" from the grub2-efi sub-package in grub2 spec and move it to the main grub2 package (PC-BIOS only). 2. Add the scriptlet in #2 above to %pre in memtest86+ package then all should be well. 3. Add a note in memtest86+ description to say that it is incompatible with UEFI. Grub2-efi will no longer request memtest86+ so it will not try to install it. If an attempt is made to install memtest86+ on a UEFI system manually then it will fail. e.g. Preparing... ######################################################################################################## ERROR: memtest86+ does not support EFI platforms. error: %prein(memtest86+-5.01-10.1.mga6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 ERROR: 'script' failed for memtest86+-5.01-10.1.mga6.x86_64 error: memtest86+-5.01-10.1.mga6.x86_64: install failed Unfortunately due to https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1670#c10 this second part may not be acceptable? Barry Although this should not cause a transaction to fail as memtest+ would no longer be recommended in a situation where it would fail, so I think that a silent fail for an attempted manual install should be OK Hmm.. another issue: drakx-installer-images BuildRequires: memtest86+ on all x86_64 --------snip-------- %ifarch %ix86 x86_64 BuildRequires: memtest86+ BuildRequires: grub BuildRequires: syslinux >= 6.03-5 %endif ---------snip------ I'm out of ideas as I don't know where/when this is used. (In reply to Barry Jackson from comment #5) > Hmm.. another issue: > > drakx-installer-images BuildRequires: memtest86+ on all x86_64 > --------snip-------- > %ifarch %ix86 x86_64 > BuildRequires: memtest86+ > BuildRequires: grub > BuildRequires: syslinux >= 6.03-5 > %endif > ---------snip------ > > I'm out of ideas as I don't know where/when this is used. CC'ing tv and tmb, they'll know :-D (In reply to Barry Jackson from comment #4) > Although this should not cause a transaction to fail as memtest+ would no > longer be recommended in a situation where it would fail, so I think that a > silent fail for an attempted manual install should be OK Yeah, I had to re-read bug 1670, but going by the information there, silently failing is the best option (at the moment!... I do hope it won't stay like this for ever, though ;-) ) CC:
(none) =>
thierry.vignaud, tmb (In reply to Marja van Waes from comment #6) > (In reply to Barry Jackson from comment #5) > > Hmm.. another issue: > > > > drakx-installer-images BuildRequires: memtest86+ on all x86_64 > > --------snip-------- > > %ifarch %ix86 x86_64 > > BuildRequires: memtest86+ > > BuildRequires: grub > > BuildRequires: syslinux >= 6.03-5 > > %endif > > ---------snip------ > > > > I'm out of ideas as I don't know where/when this is used. > > CC'ing tv and tmb, they'll know :-D > It's done to provide possibility to run memtest direcly from iso when people have trouble installing and faulty memory is suspected. Note that memtest96+ "works on uefi hw" as long as you boot with csm enabled so it can boot in legacy mode. I'm thinking of packaging the nonfree memtest (http://www.memtest86.com/) as that one provides uefi support (the free edition has no licensing restrictions what so ever) From a quick test, it no longer works on legacy HW too... Maybe a gcc5 issue... (In reply to Thierry Vignaud from comment #8) > From a quick test, it no longer works on legacy HW too... > Maybe a gcc5 issue... It's still working here on an old pIII i586 (fully updated Cauldron) with grub2. I tested with grub legacy, both the regular build and the ELF one, both ends in reboot.
Thierry Vignaud
2016-05-31 14:07:35 CEST
See Also:
(none) =>
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18261
Thierry Vignaud
2016-05-31 14:17:53 CEST
Summary:
memtest86+ fails to run on UEFI system =>
memtest86+ fails to run on UEFI system (unsupported)
Ulrich Beckmann
2017-03-13 17:27:48 CET
CC:
(none) =>
bequimao.de I have 2 PC, one with uefi and grub2 the other with legacy grub memtest86+ (installed with urpmi) works fine with grub2 and just reboot with grub. I have also tried the last Mageia-6-sta2-x86_64-DVD on another PC (Grub, no UEFI) it can only reboot the PC. CC:
(none) =>
jarillon (In reply to Thierry Vignaud from comment #10) > I tested with grub legacy, both the regular build and the ELF one, both ends > in reboot. Yes, Memtest86+ 5 just reboots with most systems I have tried. The old 4 version still works, you can try it from the MGA3 medias. Anyway, I have found that we have much better now : simply boot the normal system adding "memtest" as kernel parameter : it disables automaticaly bad ram, allowing to boot directly. This is at the expense of boot time, something like 2 minutes for a slow system with a lot of RAM. Maybe we could put a boot line using it instead of memtest86+? CC:
(none) =>
lists.jjorge
Javier Díaz
2020-03-17 11:12:54 CET
CC:
(none) =>
javier_diaz memtest86+ can't definitely run in UEFI mode on x86_64. As a result we are setting this bug to RESOLVED:INVALID Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |