Bug 18365

Summary:	reason for different config file handling of autofs?
Product:	Mageia	Reporter:	Mike Burgener <mburgener>
Component:	RPM Packages	Assignee:	Shlomi Fish <shlomif>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID	QA Contact:
Severity:	minor
Priority:	Normal	CC:	marja11
Version:	5
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Source RPM:	autofs-5.1.0-4.mga5.x86_64	CVE:
Status comment:

Description Mike Burgener 2016-05-05 10:13:20 CEST

Hi,

As Setup states, there is a different config-file handling on mageia for autofs.

My question is, is there any good reason for this?

Marja Van Waes 2016-05-08 11:39:44 CEST

CC: (none) => marja11
Assignee: bugsquad => shlomif

Comment 1 Shlomi Fish 2016-05-08 12:21:25 CEST

Hi Mike,

(In reply to Mike Burgener from comment #0)
> Hi,
> 
> As Setup states, there is a different config-file handling on mageia for
> autofs.
> 
> My question is, is there any good reason for this?

I don't know why this is the case. I just assigned myself as the autofs maintainer.

Comment 2 Marja Van Waes 2016-05-08 13:44:33 CEST

@ Mike

Please ask your question on dev@ml.mageia.org.

Bug reports are actually meant for bugs and enhancement requests ;-)

Closing this report.

Feel free to reopen it if the answer you get on dev@ml convinces you that there is a bug in our autofs package, or something that needs to be enhanced.

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => INVALID