| Summary: | libreoffice-core and libreoffice-pyuno Missing signature | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Infrastructure | Reporter: | Bit Twister <bittwister2> |
| Component: | BuildSystem | Assignee: | Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | mageia, olav, sysadmin-bugs, thierry.vignaud |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | CVE: | ||
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Bit Twister
2015-12-27 18:51:12 CET
Also saw mention of this on IRC. Hopefully it'll be fixed on the next rebuild and there isn't a larger issue with the build system. Assignee:
bugsquad =>
thierry.vignaud I cannot do anything about this. There're other packages that are unsigned BS needs to be fixed, then latest packages need to be resigned. This is sysadmin job CC:
(none) =>
sysadmin-bugs
Thierry Vignaud
2015-12-29 12:32:17 CET
CC:
(none) =>
thierry.vignaud
Olav Vitters
2016-01-01 21:55:20 CET
CC:
(none) =>
olav (In reply to David Walser from comment #1) > Also saw mention of this on IRC. Hopefully it'll be fixed on the next > rebuild and there isn't a larger issue with the build system. Hmmm, I wonder: bug 17435 - mga6: geronimo-jms Missing signature bug 17434 - mga6: apache-commons Missing signature Now that libreoffice signatures has been fixed do I close this bug and open new sig problems like the above or what? With new signature bugs I have a chance of getting the packager to submit a new compile and I can get on with trying to boot/test. don't for java packages. Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |