| Summary: | libressl to replace openssl | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Oden Eriksson <oe> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | All Packagers <pkg-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | bjarne.thomsen, luke.nukem.jones, marja11, ngompa13 |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | Mageia 7 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://www.libressl.org | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | CVE: | ||
| Status comment: | Needs to be proposed and accepted as feature for Mageia 7 | ||
|
Description
Oden Eriksson
2015-11-26 10:59:01 CET
Thanks for the heads up. I've got a few packages that will need updating. CC:
(none) =>
luke.nukem.jones Before we switch things to use libressl, this should go through as a proposed feature. We already reviewed the features proposed for Mageia 6, but there might still be time to propose this. Is nginx going to be linked with libressl? We already have libressl-common-2.3.2-1.mga6.x86_64.rpm libressl-2.3.2-1.mga6.x86_64.rpm lib64libressl-devel-2.3.2-1.mga6.x86_64.rpm in cauldron. CC:
(none) =>
bjarne.thomsen No, nothing should be linked with libressl in Mageia 6. This can be revisited afterward. (In reply to David Walser from comment #4) > No, nothing should be linked with libressl in Mageia 6. This can be > revisited afterward. Adding to the Mageia 7 tracker, so the feature proposal won't be forgotten. Assigning to all packagers collectively, because that seems better than keeping this future feature request assigned to BugSquad and ending up with no one proposing it. Status comment:
(none) =>
Needs to be proposed and accepted as feature for Mageia 7 (In reply to Marja van Waes from comment #5) > (In reply to David Walser from comment #4) > > No, nothing should be linked with libressl in Mageia 6. This can be > > revisited afterward. > > Adding to the Mageia 7 tracker, so the feature proposal won't be forgotten. > > Assigning to all packagers collectively, because that seems better than > keeping this future feature request assigned to BugSquad and ending up with > no one proposing it. We haven't discussed it yet, but we intend to use the milestone as "we want it to be done for this version", not "we might want it to be done for this version". David, Oden, can we consider it something that is good to do and that we will be able to do for Mageia 7, or should it stay as a "to be reviewed" enhancement request (in which case I'll remove the milestone for now).
Samuel Verschelde
2016-11-10 10:36:01 CET
Blocks:
18932 =>
(none) (In reply to Samuel Verschelde from comment #6) > (In reply to Marja van Waes from comment #5) > > (In reply to David Walser from comment #4) > > > No, nothing should be linked with libressl in Mageia 6. This can be > > > revisited afterward. > > > > Adding to the Mageia 7 tracker, so the feature proposal won't be forgotten. > > > > Assigning to all packagers collectively, because that seems better than > > keeping this future feature request assigned to BugSquad and ending up with > > no one proposing it. > > We haven't discussed it yet, but we intend to use the milestone as "we want > it to be done for this version", not "we might want it to be done for this > version". > > David, Oden, can we consider it something that is good to do and that we > will be able to do for Mageia 7, or should it stay as a "to be reviewed" > enhancement request (in which case I'll remove the milestone for now). Please put this in the "to be reviewed" state. With the way that OpenSSL development has been picking up and how some of the binary compatibility issues are being resolved with OpenSSL 1.1 release across all distros, it may be equally compelling to just do the move to OpenSSL 1.1. CC:
(none) =>
ngompa13 |