| Summary: | Make Konqueror use kwebkitpart by default | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Mustafa Muhammad <mustafa1024m> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Luc Menut <lmenut> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | mageia |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | CVE: | ||
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Mustafa Muhammad
2014-11-24 16:13:26 CET
Personally I think we should stick with upstream on this, but I'll leave that up to the KDE team to decide. CC:
sysadmin-bugs =>
mageia (In reply to David Walser from comment #1) > Personally I think we should stick with upstream on this, but I'll leave > that up to the KDE team to decide. I think there is no active develpment upstream, KHTML is several times slower (in JavaScript, I tried Kraken, but it didn't finish at all using KHTML, using sunspider, KHTML 2636 vs WebKit 167 on my laptop, more than 15x), and less HTML5 compilent (about 103 vs 407 out of 555 in html5test.com) Regards Mustafa (In reply to David Walser from comment #1) > Personally I think we should stick with upstream on this, but I'll leave > that up to the KDE team to decide. I prefer to follow upstream choice too. (In reply to Mustafa Muhammad from comment #2) > I think there is no active develpment upstream, KHTML is several times > slower (in JavaScript, I tried Kraken, but it didn't finish at all using > KHTML, using sunspider, KHTML 2636 vs WebKit 167 on my laptop, more than > 15x), and less HTML5 compilent (about 103 vs 407 out of 555 in html5test.com) Feel free to convince upstream Konqueror maintainer to use WebKit by default instead of KHTML. Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |