| Summary: | Packages that should be removed from the kde4 live cd | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | John Balcaen <balcaen.john> |
| Component: | Release (media or process) | Assignee: | Olivier Blin <mageia> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | balcaen.john, marja11, sysadmin-bugs, tmb |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | Mageia 2 | ||
| Hardware: | i586 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | CVE: | ||
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
John Balcaen
2011-05-24 18:06:19 CEST
@ John @ Olivier The target milestone isn't set, but this is a wish list for Mageia 2 KDE live CD, isn't it? CC:
(none) =>
marja11 (In reply to comment #1) > The target milestone isn't set, but this is a wish list for Mageia 2 KDE live > CD, isn't it? Yep. But in fact we should start thinking about what should fit on the live cd (for gnome/kde/xfce ) & probably also don't use task-de to install package (because in that case we might encounter some problems with auto-orphans when removing a « important » package ). CC:
(none) =>
balcaen.john (ping for mageia2 :) )
Manuel Hiebel
2011-11-20 01:09:54 CET
Source RPM:
(none) =>
draklive-installer
Manuel Hiebel
2011-11-20 23:43:07 CET
CC:
(none) =>
sysadmin-bugs
Manuel Hiebel
2011-12-05 19:44:59 CET
Source RPM:
draklive-installer =>
(none) (In reply to comment #0) check with the .lst of the kde4-europe1-x86_64 > kde4-splash-mga can be simply dropped from the dvd/iso/rpmstrate since we >don't > have any svg for mageia currently so it's a useless package. not here any more > do we really need libreoffice-ure-3.3.2.2-13.mga1.i586.rpm by default ? >(2,2M) still present > pinentry-gtk2-0.8.1-2.mga1 should probably not be on the kde iso(especially > since we have pinentry-qt4 > draksnapshot & rsnasphot should be dropped too (if i'm not wrong we don't have > draksnapshot on rpmstrate so we could also get ride of rsnapshot) > seahorse should also be dropped from the kde4 live cd (1,6M) > Should we really provide totem when we're providing dragon ? > (or do we need it only for totem-mozilla ? ) not here for all these > Should we provide packagekit-gstreamer-plugin ? > if i'm not wrong currently it's not working since the urpmi backend does not > provide the correct functionnality (so we can get ride of packagekit library > too) it should work now gnome-packagekit-common seems to be here CC:
(none) =>
tmb closing as it's not valid anymore but we still need more space really Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |