| Summary: | Mate Screenshot : not found | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Arnaud Vacquier <arnaud> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Atilla ÖNTAŞ <tarakbumba> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | mageia |
| Version: | Cauldron | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | meta-task | CVE: | |
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Arnaud Vacquier
2014-02-09 06:02:46 CET
Arnaud Vacquier
2014-02-09 06:03:12 CET
Source RPM:
(none) =>
mate-screenshot Install mate-utils. Probably task-mate(-minimal?) should pull also mate-utils. Assignee:
bugsquad =>
tarakbumba task-mate requires it. Minimal doesn't and shouldn't.. It's _minimal_ after all :) CC:
(none) =>
mageia okay i try this... I do clasic install with mate only. I put feedback at 6:00pm (Paris) The classical installer use the task-minimal: http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/meta-task/current/SOURCES/compssUsers.pl?view=markup#l169 So if you want package out of box installed you can add them in rpmsrates: http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/meta-task/current/SOURCES/rpmsrate-raw?view=markup#l67 Component:
New RPM package request =>
RPM Packages Hi. As Manuel has written it is a choice with the meta-task package. Especially rpmsrate file should be well configured to avoid such complains. Well, that is another issue that should be discussed by devs. While mate-utils is not broken and can be installed from repos than this bug report is not critical severity. Decreasing severity if you don' t mind. Hardware:
x86_64 =>
All That said there are two things with this bug report: 1- Classic installer should install mate-utils which includes mate-screenshot. But Mageia 4 is already released, so it is wontfix for Mageia 4. For Cauldron it is fixed and Mageia 5 will come without this issue. 2- User can always install mate-utils seperatly or install task-mate which pulls mate-utils. From this point of view this bug report is invalid. Either case, this bug report should be closed. Matter is closed as resolved-fixed or resolved-wontfix? Version:
4 =>
Cauldron Closing as fixed Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED |