Bug 12460

Summary: after classical install from USB, wpa_supplicant is missing and can't be found
Product: Mageia Reporter: Marja Van Waes <marja11>
Component: InstallerAssignee: Mageia Bug Squad <bugsquad>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: Normal CC: dvgevers, eeeemail, ennael1, mageia, tmb
Version: Cauldron   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: 4final
Source RPM: CVE:
Status comment:
Attachments: report.bug.xz of such an install
journalctl -f output when trying to get WLAN up
report.bug.xz of good 32bits install *without* the issue

Description Marja Van Waes 2014-01-28 16:11:59 CET
Created attachment 4890 [details]
report.bug.xz of such an install

both when installing KDE and when installing KDE + XFCE with the 4th round classical 64 bits iso from a USB stick, when setting up WLAN there is a message that wpa_supplicant  needs to be installed.

It can't be found, though
Comment 1 Marja Van Waes 2014-01-28 16:14:14 CET
Created attachment 4891 [details]
journalctl -f output when trying to get WLAN up

oh, and I forgot to say that I had *not* enabled additional media
Marja Van Waes 2014-01-28 16:16:22 CET

CC: (none) => ennael1, mageia, tmb

Comment 2 claire robinson 2014-01-28 16:45:25 CET
Confirmed with a default kde installation from classic dvd 64.

When configuring wifi it asks to install wpa_supplicant and then can't find medium Core Release.

CC: (none) => eeeemail

Comment 3 claire robinson 2014-01-28 16:47:06 CET
wifi for me is a usb one which was plugged in during installation, wired connection also present.
Comment 4 Marja Van Waes 2014-01-28 16:55:04 CET
for me the wlan adapter is an on-board one, lan adapter is present, but was not connected during install

Whiteboard: (none) => 4final

Comment 5 Marja Van Waes 2014-01-28 17:14:20 CET
32-bits does *not* have this issue
Comment 6 Marja Van Waes 2014-01-28 17:26:30 CET
Mageia-4-x86_64 wpa_supplicant-2.0 (x86_64)
is listed in the Mageia-4-x86_64-DVD.idx
Comment 7 Dick Gevers 2014-01-28 19:39:25 CET
To complete the picture (not confuse it, I hope): when same iso is installed from a DVD, and in summary wpa_supplicant is selected, this package is installed and can be used to work after install completes.

CC: (none) => dvgevers

Comment 8 claire robinson 2014-01-28 19:49:19 CET
Mate is also affected, it appears to be DE's without NM.
Comment 9 Colin Guthrie 2014-01-28 19:57:48 CET
So wpa_supplication is a require only of nm and conman. meta-task includes in the rpmstrate for "wireless" class.

drakx-net will pull in the packages too (code path seems unrelated to any recent change).

Does 32-bit install it as part of regular package install or is it pulled in after configuring network in the summary stage?

It looks like it could be an rpmstrate miss on x86_64 or something similar?
Comment 10 Dick Gevers 2014-01-28 20:11:05 CET
@coling

>It looks like it could be an rpmstrate miss on x86_64 or something similar?

In x86_64 I did not configure wifi in summary, I only selected wpa_supplicant as needing to run service in summary -> services, so apparently that pulled it in.

HTH
Comment 11 Marja Van Waes 2014-01-29 08:39:54 CET
Created attachment 4897 [details]
report.bug.xz of good 32bits install *without* the issue

(In reply to Colin Guthrie from comment #9)
> So wpa_supplication is a require only of nm and conman. meta-task includes
> in the rpmstrate for "wireless" class.
> 
> drakx-net will pull in the packages too (code path seems unrelated to any
> recent change).
> 
> Does 32-bit install it as part of regular package install or is it pulled in
> after configuring network in the summary stage?
> 
No, the network wasn't configured

I looked at the ddebug.log of the 32-bit install, it seems NM pulls it in

* requiring dnsmasq-base,libnl-route-3.so.200,mobile-broadband-provider-info,modemmanager,ppp[== 2.4.5],wireless-tools,wpa_supplicant for networkmanager-0.9.8.8-2.mga4.i586

which is odd, because it isn't installed

[u@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep manager
xfce4-taskmanager-1.0.0-6.mga4
xfce4-power-manager-1.2.0-8.mga4
[u@localhost ~]$ 

> It looks like it could be an rpmstrate miss on x86_64 or something similar?
Comment 12 Colin Guthrie 2014-02-23 18:04:45 CET
Did this one end up getting fixed? It smelled like some strange dep issues somewhere which perhaps just magically disappeared :p
Comment 13 Marja Van Waes 2015-04-05 19:11:25 CEST
(In reply to Colin Guthrie from comment #12)
> Did this one end up getting fixed? It smelled like some strange dep issues
> somewhere which perhaps just magically disappeared :p

sorry for never having replied, RL was too busy.

However, yes, the issue magically disappeared :-)

Status: NEW => RESOLVED
Resolution: (none) => FIXED