| Summary: | Stop iwlwifi-agn-ucode orphanization | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Mageia | Reporter: | Filipe Saraiva <mail> |
| Component: | RPM Packages | Assignee: | Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vignaud> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | davidwhodgins, tmb |
| Version: | Cauldron | Keywords: | NEEDINFO |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | CVE: | ||
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Filipe Saraiva
2013-11-25 17:31:14 CET
Running "urpmi iwlwifi-agn-ucode", after it's already installed, will mark it as a manually installed package, that will not be auto-orphaned, in the future. I'm not sure what should be done to ensure other's don't run into the same problem. Anyone using urpme --auto-orphans, is expected to know, how to prevent an orphaned package from being removed, but this bug report makes it clear, that is not the case. CC:
(none) =>
davidwhodgins Hm, Thierry... I added this a couple of weeks ago: http://gitweb.mageia.org/software/drakx/commit/?id=26b5fcd0b10715f1d0d085a1f9db5907a10185f2 Do I need to update some other code too? CC:
(none) =>
tmb (In reply to Dave Hodgins from comment #1) > Running "urpmi iwlwifi-agn-ucode", after it's already installed, > will mark it as a manually installed package, that will not be > auto-orphaned, in the future. Sure, it is correct. But if I update the kernel, I will need run "urpmi iwlwifi-agn-ucode" again. My question is, is it possible prevent the iwlwifi-agn-ucode orphanization for the kernel update case? > I'm not sure what should be done to ensure other's don't > run into the same problem. Anyone using urpme --auto-orphans, > is expected to know, how to prevent an orphaned package > from being removed, but this bug report makes it clear, that > is not the case. For my case, I configured iwlwifi-agn-ucode for don't be orphaned again. My worry is just for users with little technical expertise in this area. Thanks; Is this problem still present Filipe? Thierry, there was a question from tmb in comment #2. Keywords:
(none) =>
NEEDINFO |