| Summary: | Bugzilla should let people use their email to login too | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Infrastructure | Reporter: | Michael Scherer <misc> |
| Component: | Bugzilla | Assignee: | Sysadmin Team <sysadmin-bugs> |
| Status: | REOPENED --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Normal | CC: | LpSolit, atelier-bugs, eagle150, marcello.anni, marja11, rdalverny, sysadmin-bugs |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Source RPM: | CVE: | ||
| Status comment: | |||
|
Description
Michael Scherer
2011-05-06 12:37:55 CEST
This is not needed/useful for Bugzilla only - and I believe that's not a matter of formatting the login token, but just that the auth server accepting both email and uid. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 252 *** Status:
NEW =>
RESOLVED This is maybe something that could be changed in bugzilla config, so I'm not sure it is a duplicate of bug #252 (which is about catdap I think). CC:
(none) =>
boklm There is some software where it may not work ( for example, all software that do not let us use a proper lda filter ), and the configuration should be software per software. Status:
RESOLVED =>
REOPENED Well, it would really be best to let all users have the same auth experience. Sure, this could be done locally only for Bugzilla, but the benefit from having it enabled on a global scale, well... whether this means having LDAP handling it differently, or providing a different proxy auth service for that matter. In long term, I think an auth service would be nice. But we can also change bugzilla config (if possible) before that, as having an auth service (and agreeing how to do it) will probably take time. I agree to do it globally, but I know for sure there is case ( sympa ) where it would be difficult. So let's deploy service by service first, and to keep track of progress, open 1 bug per component :) . (In reply to comment #6) > I agree to do it globally, but I know for sure there is case ( sympa ) where it > would be difficult. So let's deploy service by service first, and to keep track > of progress, open 1 bug per component :) . If those bugs were opened, this one would depend on them, but this bug depends on no bugs at all. And maybe I don't search well, but I can't find those other bugs. CC:
(none) =>
marja11 Pinging. because nothing happened to this report since more than 3 months ago, and it still has the status NEW or REOPENED. Please set status to ASSIGNED. If for work flow reasons you can't do that, then please put OK on the whiteboard instead.
Marcello Anni
2012-02-20 13:49:23 CET
CC:
(none) =>
marcello.anni Any news? This is still open and very much unfixed! Also, is this 252 a dublicate of this bug? That one is still open and unfixed, too... CC:
(none) =>
eagle150
Bicycle RepairMan
2013-08-02 18:56:36 CEST
Hardware:
i586 =>
All (In reply to Bicycle RepairMan from comment #9) > Any news? This is still open and very much unfixed! > Also, is this 252 a dublicate of this bug? That one is still open and > unfixed, too... See this comment: (In reply to Nicolas Vigier from comment #2) > This is maybe something that could be changed in bugzilla config, so I'm not > sure it is a duplicate of bug #252 (which is about catdap I think). cc'ing Frédéric CC:
(none) =>
LpSolit Did you try setting the user_verify_class parameter to "LDAP, DB"? This parameter is at https://bugs.mageia.org/editparams.cgi?section=auth#user_verify_class_desc
Nicolas Vigier
2014-03-24 10:52:40 CET
CC:
boklm =>
(none) |